SIAI Bloggers
  • Michael Anissimov Media Director
  • Louie Helm Director of Development
  • Luke Muehlhauser Executive Director
  • Anna Salamon Research Fellow
  • Amy Willey Chief Operating Officer
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky Research Fellow
Tag Cloud
Archives

The Uncertain Future

December 12th, 2009Michael Anissimov

The Uncertain Future, a web application built by Michael Anissimov, Steve Rayhawk, Anna Salamon, Tom McCabe, and Rolf Nelson during the Singularity Institute Summer 2008 Research Program, with helpful discussions with a few others, is now in beta and ready for public announcement.

The Uncertain Future represents a new kind of futurism — futurism with heavy-tailed, high-dimension probability distributions. In fact, that’s the name of the paper presented at the European Conference on Computing and Philosophy that unveiled the project: “Changing the frame of AI futurism: From storytelling to heavy-tailed, high-dimensional probability distributions”.

Most futurism is about telling a story — more like marketing than an honest attempt at uncovering the possible range of what the future may hold. Better than creating a single story is scenario building — but this falls short as well. Scenario building is human nature, but it leaves us susceptible to anchoring effects where we overestimate the probability of vivid scenarios. To quote “Cognitive Biases Potentially Affecting Judgment of Global Risks”, page 6:

The conjunction fallacy similarly applies to futurological forecasts. Two independent sets of professional analysts at the Second International Congress on Forecasting were asked to rate, respectively, the probability of “A complete suspension of diplomatic relations between the USA and the Soviet Union, sometime in 1983″ or “A Russian invasion of Poland, and a complete suspension of diplomatic relations between the USA and the Soviet Union, sometime in 1983″. The second set of analysts responded with significantly higher probabilities. (Tversky and Kahneman 1983.)

The conjunction fallacy means that people overestimate the probability of vivid, detailed scenarios, even though each additional detail necessarily decreases the probability that the event will occur.

To combat against the conjunction fallacy and storytelling fallacies in our particular area of futurism, which includes intelligence enhancement, AI, and global catastrophic risk, we created an interactive system that allows the user to input their own probability distributions for different variables potentially associated with the future of AI and humanity, including a probability distribution of how much computing power would required to create human-level AI, a probability distribution for the likelihood of global thermonuclear war in the next century, and many other variables. Our model includes variables for the creation of AI, the possible success of intelligence amplification technology, and the potential extinction of the human species by technological mishap before either of these occurs.

Our system is built on the assumption that breaking down a challenging prediction task into its constituent parts can be quite beneficial, because it forces us to think about the task in greater detail, and avoid obvious biases associated with specific scenarios we may be anchoring on. Some people may criticize such a view for being excessively reductionist, but many prediction tasks really can be broken down into component pieces. The alternative is making “expert” guesses based on a holistic evaluation of the prediction task, which leaves us open to many well-documented biases.

Here is the opening blurb for the webapp, by Tom McCabe:

The Uncertain Future is a future technology and world-modeling project by the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence. Its goal is to allow those interested in future technology to form their own rigorous, mathematically consistent model of how the development of advanced technologies will affect the evolution of civilization over the next hundred years. To facilitate this, we have gathered data on what experts think is going to happen, in such fields as semiconductor development, biotechnology, global security, Artificial Intelligence and neuroscience. We invite you, the user, to read about the opinions of these experts, and then come to your own conclusion about the likely destiny of mankind.

It’s not perfect, but we think that our system might be a seed for looking at futurism in a different way — providing an alternative to storytelling and scenario building. This sort of “probabilistic futurism” encourages would-be seers to widen their confidence bounds when confronted with uncertainty, instead of irrationally making overconfident guesses to seem like “experts”. The particular issues we focus on are controversial — human-equivalent AI, biotechnology used to select gametes with genes associated with intelligence, the probability of planet-ending catastrophe — but we chose these issues specifically because there is disagreement about what degree of uncertainty is warranted from our present position is evaluating these scenarios.

We visualize this tool being used among futurists to specify their quantitative background assumptions regarding the technologies discussed. This might be used to clear aside straw men and zoom in on the core disagreements. It might also be used to evaluate the degree to which respective futurists have considered the technological prerequisites and other assumptions underlying their scenarios.

If you like the system or find it useful, be sure to post a link to it on Facebook, or suggest it to your friends. The system still has quite a few bugs; we used Java applets for the probability distributions, and designed it so that the Java applet makes calls to the surrounding HTML, which may fail on some combinations of OS and browser. If you use a Mac, you should use Safari, and if you use Linux/Windows, use Opera or Firefox.

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • LinkaGoGo
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Netvouz
  • RawSugar
  • Reddit
  • scuttle
  • Shadows
  • Simpy
  • Smarking
  • Spurl
  • TailRank
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb

Comments (2) (RSS feed)

Toggle comment visibility Comment by Noah Raford
Dec 12, 2009 2:54 pm

This is extremely interesting and timely. I am working on a parallel idea for my dissertation research, but following very different lines.

Ostensibly the point of scenario development is too help a group of decision makers overcome cognitive bias and widen their world view about alternative possibility states.

But the very process itself, as currently practised, is subject to significant biases, some of which you mentioned here.

Instead of pursuing greater accuracy of probability assessment of unfamiliar events, however, I take the opposite approach and have been designing a system which attempts to eliminate bias in the social aspects of the scenario building process itself, but still retains the cognitive and social strengths of storytelling and narrative (and all the learning and awareness-building impacts which it carries).

My system is still in rough development, but you can see a mock-up of the design in this video:

The Vegas System: An Extreme Scale Scenario Planning and Collaborative Sensemaking Engine

http://news.noahraford.com/?p=129

I also have a couple of posts up exploring the relationship between scenario planning and overcoming cognitive bias in group decision-making, which you might be interested in.

Keep up the great work. This is a very important topic that deserves additional attention from many different angles.

All the best,
Noah

 
Dec 23, 2009 6:06 pm

[...] Noah Raford on The Uncertain Future [...]

 

Leave a reply

Comments may take a while to appear, as they are moderated for spam.